Oklahoma’s implied consent law can affect a driver before a DUI case is resolved in criminal court. After a qualifying arrest for suspected impaired driving, Oklahoma law may require chemical testing of a driver’s breath, blood, saliva, or urine. A refusal can lead to a separate action against driving privileges, while taking the test can produce evidence that may be used in both the license case and the criminal DUI case.
Drivers in Stillwater, Oklahoma, should understand what implied consent requires, when the law applies, what happens after a refusal, and how quickly they may need to respond to a license revocation notice. Murray Law Firm helps drivers evaluate both the criminal charge and the separate consequences involving their Oklahoma driving privileges.
A license deadline can expire while the criminal DUI case is still pending.
What Is Oklahoma’s Implied Consent Law?
Under 47 O.S. § 751, a person who operates or is in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in locations covered by the statute is considered to have consented to certain chemical testing when the statutory requirements are met.
For alcohol investigations, testing may involve breath or blood. When law enforcement suspects another intoxicating substance, testing may involve blood, saliva, or urine. Oklahoma law defines other intoxicating substances broadly enough to include controlled substances and other substances capable of affecting the central nervous system, vision, hearing, sensory functions, or motor functions.
This means implied consent can apply in cases involving alcohol, illegal drugs, prescription medications, or a combination of substances.
Does Implied Consent Apply Before or After an Arrest?
The statutory implied consent procedure generally applies after an arrest arising from suspected impaired driving. The officer must have reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating or in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence.
A roadside portable breath test used during an investigation is different from the evidential breath or blood test requested through the implied consent procedure after an arrest.
Field sobriety exercises are also different. The walk-and-turn, one-leg stand, and horizontal gaze nystagmus tests are observational tools rather than chemical tests covered by the implied consent statute.
Which Chemical Test Can an Officer Request?
The driver does not necessarily choose which test law enforcement administers.
Under Oklahoma law, the arresting officer’s agency may designate whether blood or breath will be used to determine alcohol concentration. If the agency has not designated a test for alcohol, breath is generally the default. Blood may be used when a proper breath test cannot be administered.
For suspected drugs or other intoxicating substances, the designated specimen may be blood, saliva, or urine.
If a physical condition prevents a person from completing the selected test, Oklahoma law also provides for an alternate test under applicable Board of Tests rules.
James V. Murray
Attorney with Over 40 Years Experience
Joshua D. Cooper, Esq.
Oklahoma Family Law & Criminal Defense Attorney
Can You Talk to a Lawyer Before Deciding Whether to Take the Test?
Oklahoma’s current Implied Consent Advisory tells an arrested person that he or she is not entitled to consult an attorney before deciding whether to submit to the requested test.
This is different from the broader right to seek legal representation concerning the criminal case.
Because the chemical-testing decision often occurs shortly after arrest, drivers may have to make that decision before speaking with a DUI attorney.
What Happens If You Refuse a Chemical Test in Oklahoma?
A conscious person can refuse a requested chemical test, but refusing does not make the DUI investigation disappear.
Under 47 O.S. § 753, Service Oklahoma may revoke or deny driving privileges after receiving the required sworn law enforcement report concerning a refusal. The revocation generally becomes effective 45 days after written notice.
Refusal may also be used as evidence in the DUI case.
The state can still attempt to prove impairment through other evidence, including:
- Officer observations
- Driving behavior
- Body camera or dash camera footage
- Field sobriety test performance
- Statements made by the driver
- Witness testimony
- Evidence of drug or alcohol consumption
- The driver’s refusal to submit to testing
Refusing a chemical test is not the same as preventing a DUI prosecution.
Can Police Get a Blood Test After You Refuse?
Yes, in some circumstances.
If a conscious arrested person refuses a qualifying breath or blood test, Oklahoma law generally requires a search warrant before testing can be performed, subject to statutory exceptions involving probable cause that an intoxicated driver caused death or serious physical injury.
A refusal can therefore be followed by an application to a judge for a warrant authorizing a blood draw.
The legality of the warrant, the information used to obtain it, and the manner in which the blood was collected may become relevant to the defense.
Mr. Murray and his team were very professional and helpful throughout this process. As my case was very unique, I knew I was going to need a very specific and special team to help me through this. My wife and I prayed about it and God led us to Murray Law Firm. During the first consultation I requested he pray with me about it and he was quick to agree and that is when I knew we had made the right decision. They went above and beyond our expectations and won the case. I would highly recommend this firm.”
- Roger Buchanan
The Murray Law Firm worked wonders for me and my needs. James Murray along with his staff are so helpful, understanding, and answered all my questions and concerns. James was able to work his magic and get things done in such a timely manner. James even made his self available by phone after hours when I was in such need. He put not only mine but my whole families worries and concerns at ease. Would highly recommend James Murray to anyone searching for a very good attorney!"
- Tiara Rich
Jamie is personal yet professional. He can put you at ease and make you feel safe and secure. He will be at your side through this most difficult time in your life and will keep you informed about what is going on in your case and what you can expect. His staff is always ready and willing to do everything the can to help you. Highly recommended."
- Alicia Mayfield
How Long Is a Driver License Revocation for Implied Consent?
Oklahoma law separates the length of a DUI-related revocation from the minimum active ignition interlock period required through the Impaired Driver Accountability Program.
Under 47 O.S. § 6-205.1, the applicable revocation period may depend on the driver’s qualifying history within the relevant ten-year period:
- A first qualifying revocation is for no less than 180 days
- A qualifying later event can result in a revocation of no less than one year
- Two or more qualifying prior events can result in a revocation of no less than three years
Completion of applicable Impaired Driver Accountability Program requirements may also be necessary before DUI-related driving privileges can be reinstated.
Prior DUI-related revocations, IDAP participation, and certain out-of-state convictions can affect the applicable period.
What Is the Oklahoma Impaired Driver Accountability Program?
The Impaired Driver Accountability Program, or IDAP, is a central part of Oklahoma’s current DUI license system.
The Oklahoma Board of Tests states that IDAP completion is required for DUI-related arrests occurring on or after November 1, 2022. The program requires an ignition interlock device for most participants and may allow an eligible person to obtain Class D driving privileges while completing the program.
Current minimum program periods are:
- 180 active ignition interlock days for a first offense
- 365 active ignition interlock days for a second offense
- 730 active ignition interlock days for a third or subsequent offense
These IDAP periods are separate from the revocation periods described above. In particular, a third qualifying revocation may be no less than three years even though the minimum third-or-subsequent IDAP period is 730 active ignition interlock days.
The final 90 active interlock days must satisfy the Board’s violation-free requirement. Program periods cannot be served concurrently.
Service Oklahoma also states that drivers arrested for DUI on or after November 1, 2022, must complete IDAP before reinstating DUI-related driving privileges.
Can You Challenge the Revocation of Your License?
Yes, but the deadline matters.
Under 47 O.S. § 6-211, a person challenging a revocation arising under Oklahoma’s implied consent provisions generally must file a district court petition within 30 days after Service Oklahoma mails the notice of revocation.
The appeal is separate from the criminal DUI prosecution.
A driver should not assume that appearing in criminal court protects the right to challenge the license action. Waiting for the criminal case to end may cause the separate appeal deadline to expire.
What Can Be Challenged in an Implied Consent Appeal?
The issues depend partly on whether the license action resulted from a refusal or from a chemical test result.
Oklahoma law allows the district court to consider whether the officer had reasonable grounds to believe the driver was impaired and whether the driver was placed under arrest.
When the action is based on a refusal, the court may also examine whether:
- The person actually refused the test
- The required refusal warning was provided
When the action is based on a blood or breath result, issues can include whether the specimen was obtained within two hours of arrest, whether the proper warning was given, and whether the reported alcohol concentration met the applicable statutory threshold.
What Happens If You Take the Chemical Test?
For drivers age 21 or older, a blood or breath alcohol concentration of 0.08 or greater can result in administrative action when the other legal requirements are satisfied.
For drivers under 21, Oklahoma’s administrative statute applies when testing shows any measurable quantity of alcohol.
Taking the test does not mean the result cannot be questioned.
A DUI defense may examine whether the specimen was properly obtained, whether testing procedures were followed, whether the equipment and operator met Oklahoma requirements, and whether the reported result can be reliably connected to the time of driving.
Can You Request an Independent Test?
Oklahoma law provides drivers with rights concerning independent testing.
A person arrested under the implied consent provisions may request an additional test at the person’s own expense.
When law enforcement obtains a blood specimen, enough blood must be collected to permit an independent analysis. The excess specimen is generally retained for 60 days, during which the tested person or the person’s attorney may direct that it be sent to an approved laboratory for independent analysis.
An independent analysis may become relevant when the accuracy or handling of the state’s blood test is disputed.
What Happens If the Driver Is Unconscious?
Oklahoma law specifically addresses unconscious drivers.
Under the implied consent statute, a person who is unconscious or otherwise incapable of refusing is considered not to have withdrawn the consent created by the statute, subject to applicable legal and constitutional requirements.
Cases involving unconscious or seriously injured drivers can raise additional questions concerning arrest, medical treatment, blood collection, and constitutional search requirements.
Does Implied Consent Apply to Drugs and Prescription Medication?
Yes.
Oklahoma’s law is not limited to alcohol. Testing may be requested when officers have qualifying grounds to suspect impairment involving another intoxicating substance or a combination of alcohol and another substance.
A legally prescribed medication can still become relevant to a DUI investigation if officers allege that it impaired the person’s ability to operate a vehicle safely.
The fact that a medication was legally prescribed does not automatically resolve the question of impairment.
Is the License Case Separate From the Criminal DUI Case?
Yes. A DUI arrest can create two different proceedings.
The criminal prosecution addresses whether the state can prove DUI, actual physical control, or another charged offense.
The administrative case addresses the driver’s legal privilege to operate a vehicle.
A favorable result in one proceeding does not automatically determine the result in the other. Drivers may need to address IDAP, ignition interlock requirements, and a district court appeal while the criminal case remains pending.
Common Questions About Oklahoma Implied Consent
No. Prosecutors can use other evidence to attempt to establish impairment, and police may seek a warrant for blood testing after a refusal.
For DUI-related arrests covered by the current program, the Oklahoma Board of Tests and Service Oklahoma state that IDAP completion is required before DUI-related driving privileges can be reinstated.
Eligible IDAP participants may be able to obtain Class D driving privileges through Service Oklahoma while complying with ignition interlock and program requirements. Eligibility depends on the driver’s record and circumstances.
Equipment operation, maintenance, testing procedures, operator qualifications, and Board of Tests requirements may all be reviewed when evaluating chemical-test evidence.
Not necessarily. The criminal case and the administrative driving-privilege proceeding are separate matters.
Related Videos
Choosing a DUI Attorney
DUI Penalties
What Should You Do After an Oklahoma DUI Arrest?
Read every document you receive from law enforcement, Service Oklahoma, the court, and the Board of Tests. Pay particular attention to dates because the opportunity to challenge a revocation can expire before the criminal DUI case is resolved.
Preserve your paperwork, write down what happened during the stop and testing process while the events are fresh, and do not assume that the criminal court date is the only deadline that matters.
Speak With a Stillwater DUI Attorney About Implied Consent
If you were arrested for DUI in Stillwater, a refusal, blood test, breath result, IDAP requirement, or license revocation can have consequences separate from the criminal charge.
Murray Law Firm can review the traffic stop, arrest, implied consent procedure, chemical testing, Service Oklahoma action, and criminal allegations to help you understand the options available in your case.
Contact Murray Law Firm today to schedule a free consultation with a Stillwater DUI attorney. Call (405) 338-7899.
